UNCIRCUMCISED FILIPINOS: Luscious Beauty

Thursday, May 10, 2007

Luscious Beauty

Luscious Beauty...
by Leilah McCracken

Luscious Beauty and Sadness Beyond Words(love song for the intact penis)
I am a foreskin novice. I have never known a lover with an intact penis; my six sons, of course, are intact, but I do not examine their penises! (Nor clean them for that matter, they clean themselves.) So in researching this newsletter, I was looking at pictures of intact penises on activist websites... and my response to them startled me. I will share my experiences here, in the interest of at least one mother or father reading this thinks twice about circumcising their baby boy.
I used to think penises were rather bland and straightforward - nowhere near as interesting as the external female genitalia. But then I saw photos of intact, erect, adult male penises... and wow. Crazy arousal, sadness - mad thoughts ran through my mind, won't share them here, but my jaw was on the floor... I simply had no idea how luscious and sexy men could be. Intact penises look so hot... everything about them looks so wild and amazing. The foreskin adds such a level of sexy beauty to penises - a wild, sexy mystery. It is like a... veil that is drawn back, and slowly, dark, wet male beauty is revealed.
Wow. Apparently on some TV show women were talking about non-circumcised men (I think it was "Sex in the City" or something) and they said "eeewww!" Well I say "eeeewww" to their silly reaction!!! Luscious mystery; intact loveliness; beauty and wild ecstasy unveiled... wow. Intact penises are the sexiest things I have ever seen. Their beauty makes my head dizzy. They - say the women who have been intimate with them - feel like silk, and are beautiful to have inside them. Men say foreskins feel good for them too - like soft, long hair caressing their penises. But it's built in...
My husband is circumcised. Excuse me while I @%^$#%$&%&^*%&^%$$% out loud about that - what beauty have we both been deprived of? - what sweetness of ecstasy? Foreskins account for an enormous amount of the male sensory experience - and the female... sweet sliding skin that lubricates itself - wow. Wish I could have some, but I can't, never will, and it hurts. It really hurts. I am a one man woman, I love my husband. But my heart hurts. I wish so badly that he didn't get his penis cut apart as a baby boy - not just for my own selfish reasons of course, but also for his - can you imagine the pain of it - the foreskin, says one intact man, "isn't the wrapper on the candy, it's the candy". It feels good. So can you imagine the pain of having it sliced off???
My husband says it doesn't bother him that he is circumcised. Well I'd say the same thing if my clitoris were cut off as a girl, and I'd never know the ecstasy of it. I'd not let it matter. But it would!!! A comparison that many women will relate to: women who have episiotomies (their vaginas cut open by their doctors or midwives in birth) often have reduced sexual sensation afterwards - the cut permanently severs sex-receptive nerves. "At least I have a healthy baby" - they will rationalize their loss of ecstasy with that - but- what if it's not true? What if the cut was done so the baby would just pop out instead of ease out? (Episiotomies have been proven in mountains of research papers to be cruel and pointless.) How could she rationalize that? "I lost my orgasms so my doctor could get home in time for dinner" - can you imagine the rage that she would experience if she understood what was lost? (And does she dare touch the rage, and see what lies beyond it?)
Translate that into the male experience. If all those men who were ever circumcised understood that their penises could be have been particularly exquisite tools for pleasure (and that "health and hygiene" reasons for circumcising amount to nil) would they be so eager to circumcise their own little boys because it was "good enough for them"? Do they dare touch the sex that was so quickly and permanently lost? It's a pain beyond rage. Why are beautiful bodies medical platforms for invasion? Why do cut genitals equate "medical care"?
I am so sad that neither my husband nor I can ever know him in his most natural form: intact- perfect- beautiful. He is beautiful as he is now, but he bears the mark of the wounded baby... and a mutilated man. And for this I will always be sorry.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...: I do not understand anyone of either sex claiming the cylinder of skin that comprises the non excited
non circumcised penis looks sexy ! It looks very blah- enough so that it expains why the europeans are more comfortable with nudity and it explains why the olympics originally were in the nude but barred those with the (circumcised) bare penis!

In all other animals the bare glans and shaft is inserted into the vagina for sex. In about half of the uncircumcised men there is a tendency for the foreskin to not move along with the glans providing the "famed gliding action"- which by diminishing the amount of direct contact between male parts and female- can reduce the quality of the experience. For the male intercourse becomes "masturbating in his foreskin". For the female there is less stroking of the inside.

I have only been circumcised the last half of my 83 year life. I did however from age 12 on wear the foreskin retracted.

I would not choose to look down there and see a covered up glans- the innocuous looking skin!

I have plenty of sensitivity in that "exposed since age 12" glans.

I enjoy the enhanced version of the male sex organ!; December 28, 2007 at 1:15 PM
Anonymous said...: hal: It is not just skin. It contains 20,000 nerves, making the foreskin as sensitive as the lips. (Imagine if a kiss on the cheek was the best kind of kiss you could get!).

Animals are all different. Some have a bone in their penis. Their foreskins may function differently.

If you didn't appreciate yours when you had it, well, that's your loss and your right, but it doesn't give anyone the right to take that experience and that choice away from anyone else.; June 30, 2008 at 5:29 PM
Anonymous said...: There is a motion which accompanies uncircumcised males while he is penetrating a female. This motion equates to heightened pleasure for the female and male both. I say this as a female who has had intercourse with both. It is much more pleasurable with uncircumcised and to be really frank -I experienced the most mindblowing vaginal orgasms every time with uncirucmcised because of this particular motion inside and this never happened with circumcised partner--(same position woman on top with similar sized penis) these orgasms were definitely due to the motion of his foreskin. Do not cut off a part of a man or woman that is theirs and God given. If so many countries do not circumcise without negative impacts it should say something. It is a barbaric and cruel practice. I can see how it can be perceived that the unwrapped banana must provide more pleasure but the fact of the matter is in this situation: the banana skin really does contain thousands of nerve endings and contributes to the whole of the sexual experience for the man - imagine the banana peel moving back and forth. Get it? motion motion motion that does not exist for circumised males. Even masturbating for men is more pleasurable because there is so much more skin and motion. How else to explain. I hope I covered enough from both angles. Ask as many females they will say the same thing. In old testament ideology so to speak the practice was initiated literally to prevent sexual pleasure and to make men more "theology minded". It has had a reverse effect in my opinion because the men are never completely satisfied nor the women and this in effect creates an unfulfillment which in turn translates to seeking out more sex partners or other abnormal tendencies maybe even violent ones. Sexual pleasure is a gift and not one to be taken lightly as well the anatomy God gave you. By decreasing male or female sexual pleasure, you are really doing alot of damage whether psychological or physical. Luckily, the circumcised males do not know what they are missing out on- they can't know unless they talk to an uncircumcised male and attempt to understand fully: the role of the foreskin, the sensitivity of the nerve endings in it and the motion it creates while it sits on the penis and when it is touched or it completely alters the sexual experience (motion)- all of these things are very paramount in his pleasure and hers.; November 8, 2009 at 7:45 AM

Prepuce for Sale

Since the 1980s, private hospitals have been involved in the business of supplying discarded foreskins to private bio-research laboratories and pharmaceutical companies who require human flesh as raw research material. They also supply foreskins to transnational corporations such as Advanced Tissue Sciences of San Diego, California, [1] Organogenesis, [2] and BioSurface Technology, [3] who have recently emerged to reap new corporate profits from the sale of marketable products made from harvested human foreskins. In 1996 alone, Advanced Tissue Sciences could boast of a healthy $663.9 million market capitalization performance.

http://www.sexuallymutilatedchild.org/f4sale.htm

LETTERS FROM THE EMAIL

Genital cutting practices vary widely in The Philippines.

Many guys are cut in hospitals by Western-trained doctors, but there is only one doctor per 10,000 Filipinos (vs about 1 doctor per 500 Americans). Most traditionally "circumcised" Filipinos are actually supercised, which is to say the skin tube is drawn forward and a longitidinal slit is made in the top at the rollover point. The skin can then flop free of the glans but nothing has been amputated. Such a cut person will self-report that he has been circumcised.

Most genital cutting in The Philippines is in defiance of the Catholic church's official policy against it.

-Ron (dome68iou1@juno.com)

DR.'S ADVICE ON MONGOLIAN VD

While in China , a man is very sexually promiscuous and does not use a condom all the time.

A week after arriving back ìŸ¦ome in the States, he wakes one morning to find his penis covered with bright green and purple spots. Horrified, he immediately goes to see a doctor.

The doctor, never having seen anything like this before, orders some tests and tells the man to return in two days for the results.

The man returns a couple of days later and the doctor says: "I've got bad news for you --- you've contracted Mongolian VD.

It's very rare and almost unheard of here. We know very little about it."

The man looks a little perplexed and says: "Well, give me a shot or something and fix me up, Doc."

The doctor answers: "I'm sorry, there's no known cure. We're going to have to amputate your penis."

The man screams in horror, "Absolutely not ! I want a second opinion."

The doctor replies: "Well, it's your choice. Go ahead if you want but surgery is your only choice."

The next day, the man seeks out a Chinese doctor, figuring that he'll know >more about the disease.

The Chinese doctor examines his penis and proclaims: "Ah, yes, Mongolian VD. Vely rare disease.

The guy says to the doctor: "Yeah, yeah, I already know that, but what can we do?
My American doctor wants to operate and amputate my penis!"

The Chinese doctor shakes his head and laughs: "Stupid Amelican docta, always want to opelate. Make more money that way. No need to opelate!"

"Oh, Thank God!" the man replies.

"Yes," says the Chinese doctor, "You no worry!Wait two weeks. Faw off by itself!

(THIS IS JUST A JOKE)

Shorter thrusts

Marilyn Milos cites a 1999 study published in the British Journal of Urology which documented that women were more likely to have an orgasm (and less likely to experience vaginal discomfort) with an uncircumcised partner. The study concluded that the uncircumcised penis glides within its sheath of moveable skin with minimal friction. Because of this, uncut men use shorter thrusts than cut partners, who drive more deeply to launch an orgasm. The shorter thrusts of uncircumcised men, according to 71 percent of the respondents, allowed more contact with the mons pubis and clitoris, creating more orgasms for the women.

The First Cut

Restore Yourself

Now, I dont believe a mistake was made when man was created, do you? Even if one doesn't believe in creation, nature just doesn't repeatedly make what doctors are considering to be faults in baby boys that must be fixed. I understand that those of the Jewish faith regularly circumcise the male child but according to what I have learned, they only remove a very small portion of the foreskin at the tip of the glans. Doctors in the U.S. remove the whole thing which is a lot of skin and amounts to approximately the size of a 3 x 5 inch index card in an adult male! Many times they accidentally remove even more skin than this and boys grow up with either painful erections or their erections are bent because the skin is stretched too tight. Both men and women usually believe that's just the way some penises look and never question it. There can be other complications also. Circumcised males grow up never knowing that they lost a natural function of the penis and lost a great amount of sexual pleasure.

http://www.restoreyourself.com

LET'S GET CIVILISED

Male or female circumcision is the practice of surgically modifying the private part of the human being. This practice, in one form or the other, exists in many parts of the world, not least of all in Africa, and in particular, Nigeria. Female circumcision is negatively referred to as female genital mutilation. It is difficult to understand why male circumcision is not referred to in the same way. Some insight into this is necessary.

Most of us may not realise that male circumcision is NOT common in many parts of the world, particularly in the Western world. It may come as a shock to many to find that the average European man is uncircumcised. In fact, the hospitals in the UK, US and most other Western countries do not perform circumcision. It is considered an outdated religious practice. Should you require it for, say, a baby boy, you would have to seek out a Jewish rabbi or some other practitioners to have it done. The Jews are the only white group with a history of circumcision.

It must, therefore, be understood that the issue of circumcision, whether for male or for female, is completely outside the cultural practices (or understanding) of the Western world. They neither understand nor accept the practice. They are, therefore, not qualified to determine the expediency of the practice. Male circumcision is simply tolerated because the Bible speaks about it. Otherwise, we would have been faced with Western media onslaughts accompanied by local "let's get civilised" civil rights, NGO and other groups, trying to convince us that male circumcision is primitive, barbaric, reduces male sexuality, scars the organ and causes untold pain and suffering to the baby. That it risks permanent deformation and disability to the baby, or death through fatal infection. It is, therefore, totally unjustified and unjustifiable.

Our ancestors could even have been accused of circumcising to prevent male promiscuity! Statistics would be provided to show that uncircumcised men are more virile, and more fertile than the circumcised ones. Parents would be accused of violating the rights of their baby boys. Imagine then, the difficulty of trying to convince our "been-to" and Western-oriented elites that male circumcision representing hundreds of years of ancestral practice should only be changed with caution if at all, and then only when it is OBVIOUS to the people that the practice is dangerous, and has become unnecessary, having been overtaken by practices generally considered more advantageous to the people as a whole. Imagine a situation where there was a British or American law against male circumcision. Thank God for the Bible.

Some would say that female circumcision is not in the Bible but neither is wine-carrying, or church weddings - that does not make it wrong. Female circumcision is not synonymous with VVF as many groups have fraudulently implied. And the general conception that it is performed to reduce female sexual pleasure has been manipulated to inflame gender rights emotions. This was effectively shown a few years back in Lagos when, on an Igbo phone-in program, the presenter asked people to call in and air their views on the issue of female circumcision. The responses were enlightening. Not only were all the callers female and circumcised, each and every one of them insisted that she has or will circumcise any daughter of hers. None believed that her circumcision had affected her negatively, and all considered it a practice worth retaining.

The impression I got was that it was mainly the uncircumcised (and many opportunistic NGOs) that had a grouse with the practice. My reflection on the issue led me to wonder -- what would the Western advocates of human rights abuse think of this? Whether right or wrong, the facts remain. Like the response of the nurse shows, many girls have a clitoris which extends outside the vagina. Discussions with these girls will tell you that for such people, even the simple act of walking can be a serious turn-on. In this situation, how can anyone say that a well-performed circumcision will not be morally beneficial to the girl?

A critic may insist that this is the same as trying to stop promiscuity. If a mother helping her girl to manage sexual excesses as stated above is wrong, then taking her to a doctor to correct a malformed leg could also be wrong. Depending on your viewpoint (Western or Traditional) female circumcision may or may not be expedient at this point in our national development, but for God's sake, let us stop the foolishness of presuming that our ancestors were idiots who did things without reason, and who enjoyed the pain of the screaming baby. Mean old men who approved a practice fraught with risks for the baby and its parents (to whom the baby was considered precious). Thinking so would be the height of colonialism.

Relevant Links

West Africa
Human Rights
Nigeria
Women and Gender

As the practice carries a risk of infection, deformation, bad scarring and other problems due to the way it is presently being handled, we can have qualified medical practitioners perform it as is done for males. We are then left with the matter of its social expediency.

At this point, I would advice that the choice remains with the parents until such a time when the practice is well researched and understood without Western bias by our own people, and in our own environment. I say this because I find that most NGO discussions refer to the worst forms of the practice, usually based on information from other parts of the world. Many parts of the world definitely perform circumcision very differently, both in content and in context. For some, it is just token, while for others, it is major surgery. Using inapplicable or exaggerated examples give rise to serious misinformation, with its attendant error of judgment. Is it right to throw away everything? The baby with the bath water? There are as many arguments for male circumcision as against it (Europeans and Moslems will tell you), and so it is for female circumcision.

As detailed earlier, all the arguments against female circumcision also apply to their male counterpart. The main difference is that well-trained doctors or birth attendants handle the boys. The common question is -Why female circumcision? My answer would be - Why male circumcision? We cannot even say we practice male circumcision because it is in the Bible since the practice predates the coming of Christianity, and the missionaries were probably NOT circumcised.

http://allafrica.com

SMEGMA

A natural secretion of skin cells and oils that collects under the foreskin in both males and females. If allowed to grow stale, it may have a pungent aroma (commonly compared to cheese [males] or fish [females]), and has lubricant, pheromonal (sexual attractant) and perhaps bacteriostatic (bacteria-killing) functions. The quantity varies, but it is comparable to earwax. (In one survey, three out of 18 self-selected intact men never saw smegma; one saw it after a week unwashed; six after two days; eight after one day; and one after less than a day. Three out of seven circumcised men reported seeing smegma.) (Gk. = soap)

The Perfect Extension - 7" - $ 29.99
The Perfect Extension is a prosthetic penis designed for use with or without an erection. This realistically detailed prosthetic device has a seven inch total length with an inside depth of five inches. The Perfect Extension features a soft, skin-like outer sleeve and an outside diameter of two inches. The extension comes with a tie-on harness for sturdier penetration. The Perfect Extension should be used with a water-soluble lubricants. It's extremely comfortable for both the user and the partner. This prosthetic was made from rubber for a natural feel.

The Rejoyn Pump - Battery Powered - $ 188.99
An explanation: A large number of men suffer from erectile dysfunction (a type of impotence). Trouble developing and sustaining an erection is quite common. One way that many people have found to help overcome these problems involves this product. Men that have trouble developing an erection have learned that penis pumps can be used to encourage blood flow to their penis, thus causing a stronger erection. Men that have trouble sustaining an erection, have learned that once sufficient blood flow has entered the penis they can use a erection ring to discourage blood flow out of the penis. Discouraging the blood from leaving their penis allows them to sustain their erection during lovemaking. Here are some features that distinguish the Pos-T-Vac / Rejoyn battery powered pump from lower price pump sets. The Rejoyn pump has an automatic safety valve that monitors vacuum and automatically releases when you have achieved full vacuum pressure. This Pos-T-Vac / Rejoyn uses a battery powered pump that generates vacuum at the push of a button. within a few seconds you can achieve a full erection. Rejoyn's design makes it comfortable to pump, and is easier to operate than hand-squeeze pumps. Comfortable, Multi-sized contriction rings. The special elastomer constriction rings are clinically designed to effectively maintain an erection while being comfortable to wear. The Rejoyn system includes 4 multi-sized rings ensuring you a precise fit. Rejoyn includes a convenient loading cone to transfer the constriction ring onto the vacuum cylinder. The Rejoyn pump has quality construction and is made of shatter resistant lexan and ABS plastic. The Rejoyn pump includes a soft-side storage case that makes travel easy. This kit contains 1 vacuum therapy device, 1 loading cone, 4 multi-sized constriction rings, and 1 soft-side storage case. We hope that this product can allow you to sustain a happy and healthy sex life. Uses 2 AA batteries NOTE: Due to the Nature of this product, we cannot accept returns after the sealed portion of the packaging has been opened.

UNCIRCUMCISED FILIPINOS

Thursday, May 10, 2007

Luscious Beauty

3 comments:

JOIN US!

Boy dies from circumcision in the Philippines

NO INFORMED OR VOLUNTARY CONSENT

Not A Birth Defect!

Support Group for Uncircumcised Men in the Philippines

Subscribe to uncircumcisedfilipinos

Powered by groups.yahoo.com